| Also in this
Section: |
Professional and Ethical BehaviorThe CEE Department at Cal is committed to providing its students the very best education that is possible within its resources. The CEE Department tries to attract the finest faculty members, endeavor to maintain excellent laboratory facilities, and support a number of co-curricular activities that enhance the undergraduate student's experience. Yet, for the Department to succeed, it is not enough for the faculty and administration to carry out their respective obligations. It is equally important that every student assume his or her individual responsibilities as future engineering professionals.Here's your Professional and Ethical Responsibility. Foremost among these, of course, is the student's responsibility to perform academically to the full extent of his or her ability. In so doing, it is assumed that each student will observe the basic tenets of academic honesty. Therefore, any act of cheating or misrepresenting one's own or someone else's academic work will be considered a very serious offense. Intellectual products -- including papers, exams, laboratory reports, articles, and books - - are the heart and soul of any university's academic life. We cannot permit them to be willfully compromised or expropriated (that means stealing!). Please define "Academic Dishonesty". Academic dishonesty is any action or attempted action that results in
creating an unfair academic advantage for oneself or an unfair academic
advantage or disadvantage for any other member or members of the academic
community. For example, copying all or part of another person's work, or
using reference materials not specifically allowed are forms of cheating
that will not be tolerated. Academic dishonesty can take the following
forms:
But my goldfish ate my homework and...... If an instructor finds that a student is involved in an incident of
academic dishonesty, the instructor will notify the student and the following
policy will apply.
2. The instructor must inform the student and the Department Chair (preferably in writing) of the incident, the action taken, if any, and the student's right to appeal to the Manager of the Office of Student Conduct. Involving the Manager of the Office of Student Conduct at the early stages of a case is advisable when the student denies the charge of cheating. 3. The instructor should retain copies of any written evidence or observation notes. 4. The Department Chair must inform the Manager of the Office of Student Conduct of incident, the student's name, and the action taken by the instructor. To discourage repeat offenses, notification of the resolution of each charge of cheating must be given to the Office of Student Conduct. 5. The Office of Student Conduct may choose to conduct a formal hearing on the incident and to assess a penalty for misconduct (see the University of California at Berkeley Code of Student Conduct). 6. The Department will recommend that students involved in a second incident of academic dishonesty be dismissed from the University. 7. A student also has grounds for an appeal of his or her grades to the Chair of the Department's Grievance Committee if he or she feel that considerations of race, politics, religion, sex, or sexual harassment affected his or her grades, or that his or her work was evaluated by other criteria that do not directly reflect his or her performance of the course requirements. Time to "Bottom-line it" The best advice is to play it straight. Ethics and integrity are two
of the qualities that make a professional CEE. Now is the time to start
practicing. Remember that the world needs CEEs:
• whose word is their bond, • who put character and honesty above wealth, • who do not hesitate to take chances, • who will not lose their identity in a crowd, • who will be as honest in small things as in great things, • who will make no compromise with wrong, • whose ambitions are not confined to their own selfish desires, • who will not say they do it "because everybody else does it," • who are true to their friends through good report and evil report, in adversity as well as in prosperity, • who do not believe that shrewdness and cunning are the best qualities for winning success, • who are not ashamed to stand for the truth when it is unpopular, and • who have integrity and wisdom in addition to knowledge.
|